Why Judy Schwank said no to voter ID
Thursday, March 15, 2012 at 09:23AM Senator Judy Schwank of Berks County just sent an email to her listserv, and it included an explanation of why she voted "no" on HB 934, the voter ID bill:
I voted against this bill for an inspiring woman named Anna Urban, who I met several years ago.
Anna, who resided in the Millmont section of Reading, worked in the city’s garment mills all her life. At age 95, she was proud that her voting record dated back to the Great Depression.
She didn’t drive but she wanted to vote on Election Day so she called 9-1-1. The county emergency dispatch center put her in contact with Election Services, which, in turn, referred her to me. I happily offered her a ride.
When Anna walked in to the polling place on my arm, you would have thought she was Lady Liberty herself. She was so happy to be there. It was inspiring to see this woman’s determination to exercise her right to vote.
It would be the last vote Anna Urban ever cast, as she died shortly after the election.
If this bill is enacted into law and she were alive today to vote in the November 2012 election, she would be required to cast a provisional vote that possibly would not count, simply because she didn’t have photo identification. She would have six days to obtain proper identification. For a woman in her nineties with trouble walking and obtaining a ride to her polling place, let alone to a driver’s license center, this would be a challenging task.
Undoubtedly, this measure will have a negative impact on voting citizens who, like Anna, do not drive and therefore do not have a driver’s license.
Voting is a right. It should not be an endurance test.
Judy Schwank,
local news,
politics in
Local News,
Politics 



